Air Force Fact Sheets. This database holds fact sheets on Air Force weapons, organizations, inventory, careers and equipment. Air Force fact sheets contain up to date. Up to 6,000 jihadists now fighting with al Qaeda groups July 2, 2013 Thousands of foreign terrorists traveled to Syria over the past several months to wage jihad, or. F22s, B52s Lead New Wave of Strikes Targeting Taliban Finances in Afghanistan The Air Forces most advanced fighter and its heaviest bomber flew a series of. Usaf Weapons File' title='2013 Usaf Weapons File' />Lockheed Martin F 2. Raptor Wikipedia. The Lockheed Martin F 2. Download Roy Orbison At The Rock House Rar Software'>Download Roy Orbison At The Rock House Rar Software. Raptor is a fifth generation, single seat, twin engine, all weather stealth tactical fighter aircraft developed for the United States Air Force USAF. The result of the USAFs Advanced Tactical Fighter program, the aircraft was designed primarily as an air superiority fighter, but also has ground attack, electronic warfare, and signal intelligence capabilities. The prime contractor, Lockheed Martin, built most of the F 2. Boeing provided the wings, aft fuselage, avionics integration, and training systems. Flightglobal is the global aviation communitys primary source of news, data, insight, knowledge and expertise. We provide news, data, analytics and advisory. The USAFs aircraft fleet will continue to see its average age rise, even if it gets every aircraft it wants. Many of its planes are now older than their pilots, and. The Lockheed Martin F22 Raptor is a fifthgeneration, singleseat, twinengine, allweather stealth tactical fighter aircraft developed for the United States Air. The aircraft was variously designated F 2. FA 2. 2 before it formally entered service in December 2. F 2. 2A. After a protracted development and despite operational issues, the USAF considers the F 2. The Raptors combination of stealth, aerodynamic performance, and situational awareness gives the aircraft unprecedented air combat capabilities. The high cost of the aircraft, a lack of clear air to air missions due to delays in Russian and Chinese fighter programs, a ban on exports, and development of the more versatile F 3. F 2. 2 production. N 1 A final procurement tally of 1. F 2. 2 was delivered to the USAF in 2. DevelopmenteditOriginseditIn 1. U. S. Air Force developed a requirement for an Advanced Tactical Fighter ATF as a new air superiority fighter to replace the F 1. Eagle and F 1. 6 Fighting Falcon. Code named Senior Sky, this program was influenced by the emerging worldwide threats, including development and proliferation of Soviet Su 2. Flanker and Mi. G 2. Fulcrum class fighter aircraft. It would take advantage of the new technologies in fighter design on the horizon, including composite materials, lightweight alloys, advanced flight control systems, more powerful propulsion systems, and stealth technology. The request for proposals RFP was issued in July 1. LockheedBoeingGeneral Dynamics and NorthropMc. Donnell Douglas, were selected on 3. October 1. 98. 6 to undertake a 5. YF 2. 2 and the YF 2. The program was managed by the Advanced Tactical Fighter Systems Program Office ATF SPO located at Wright Patterson AFB. Each design team produced two prototype air vehicles, one for each of the two engine options. The Lockheed led team employed thrust vectoringnozzles on YF 2. The ATFs increasing weight and cost drove out certain requirements during development. Side looking radars were deleted, and the dedicated infra red search and track IRST system was downgraded from multi color to single color and then deleted as well. However, space and cooling provisions were retained to allow for future addition of these components. The ejection seat requirement was downgraded from a fresh design to the existing Mc. Donnell Douglas. ACES II. After the flight test demonstration and validation of the prototypes, on 2. April 1. 99. 1, Secretary of the USAFDonald Rice announced the YF 2. ATF competition. 1. The YF 2. 3 design was considered stealthier and faster, while the YF 2. The aviation press speculated that the YF 2. U. S. Navys Navalized Advanced Tactical Fighter NATF, but by 1. Navy had abandoned NATF. Production and procurementedit. Manufacturers of the F 2. Prime contractor Lockheed Martin Aeronautics manufactured the majority of the airframe and performed final assembly at Dobbins Air Reserve Base in Marietta, Georgia program partner Boeing Defense, Space Security provided additional airframe components as well as avionics integration and training systems. F 2. 2 production was split up over many subcontractors across 4. Congressional support,1. Many capabilities were deferred to post service upgrades, reducing the initial cost but increasing total program cost. Production supported over 1,0. The F 2. 2 had several design changes from the YF 2. The swept back angle of the leading edge was decreased from 4. To improve pilot visibility, the canopy was moved forward 7 inches 1. The shapes of the wing and stabilator trailing edges were refined to improve aerodynamics, strength, and stealth characteristics. Increasing weight during development caused slight reductions in range and aerodynamic performance. The first F 2. 2, an engineering and manufacturing development EMD aircraft named Raptor 4. Marietta, Georgia, on 9 April 1. September 1. 99. 7. In 2. 00. 6, the Raptors development team, composed of over 1,0. USAF, won the Collier Trophy, American aviations most prestigious award. The F 2. 2 was in production for 1. The USAF originally envisioned ordering 7. ATFs at a cost of 2. The 1. 99. 0 Major Aircraft Review led by Secretary of Defense. Dick Cheney reduced this to 6. By 1. 99. 7, funding instability had further cut the total to 3. F 2. 2s by 2. 00. In 2. 00. 4, the Department of Defense Do. D further reduced this to 1. USAFs preference for 3. In 2. 00. 6, a multi year procurement plan was implemented to save 1. That year the programs total cost was projected to be 6. F 2. 2s distributed to seven combat squadrons. In 2. 00. 7, Lockheed Martin received a 7. F 2. 2s and extend manufacturing through 2. In April 2. 00. 6, the Government Accountability Office GAO assessed the F 2. Unit Procurement Cost was estimated at 1. Costco Sea Ray Programme on this page. Serial Flash Memory Programmer Schematic'>Serial Flash Memory Programmer Schematic. It was estimated by the end of production, 3. The incremental cost for an additional F 2. The GAO stated the estimated cost was 4. Ban on exportsedit. Two F 2. 2s during flight testing, the upper one being the first EMD F 2. Raptor 4. 00. 1The F 2. American federal law3. Customers for U. S. F 1. 5 Eagle and F 1. Fighting Falcon or the newer F 3. Lightning II, which contains technology from the F 2. In September 2. 00. Congress upheld the ban on foreign F 2. Despite the ban, the 2. Do. D to prepare a report on the costs and feasibility for an F 2. F 2. 2 export sales on U. S. aerospace industry. Some Australian politicians and defense commentators proposed that Australia should attempt to purchase F 2. F 3. 5s,4. 54. F 2. F 3. However, the Royal Australian Air Force RAAF determined that the F 2. F 3. 5s strike and close air support roles. The Japanese government also showed interest in the F 2. Replacement Fighter program. The Japan Air Self Defense Force JASDF would reportedly require fewer fighters for its mission if it obtained the F 2. However, in 2. 00. F 2. 2 would require increases to the defense budget beyond the historical 1 percent of GDP. With the end of F 2. Japan chose the F 3. December 2. 01. 1. Israel also expressed interest, but eventually chose the F 3. F 2. 2s price and unavailability. Production terminationeditThroughout the 2. F 2. 2s was debated due to rising costs and the lack of relevant adversaries. In 2. 00. 6, Comptroller General of the United States David Walker found that the Do. D has not demonstrated the need for more investment in the F 2. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon R. England, Senator John Mc. Cain, and Chairman of U. S. Senate Committee on Armed Services Senator John Warner. The F 2. 2 program lost influential supporters in 2. Secretary of the Air Force Michael Wynne and the Chief of Staff of the Air Force General T. Michael Moseley. 5. Nevertheless, in 2. Congress passed a defense spending bill funding the F 2. Pentagon released 5. Two F 2. 2As in close trail formation. In November 2. 00.